Back to Top skip to main content
Green and Spiegel - An Immigration Law Firm - United States
Mar 15, 2020

COVID-19 Testing Not Subject to Review for Public Charge Rule

Stephen Antwine

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently enacted a new rule requiring the consideration of certain cash and non-cash public benefits when adjudicating certain immigration petitions.  The rule, known as the Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds (Public Charge Rule), allows USCIS to deny an immigrant or non-immigrant application if the foreign national has received cash assistance, food stamps, certain types of Medicaid or public housing assistance.  USCIS asserts that, reliance on one or more of these benefits is not determinative of a denial; rather, the totality of the immigrant’s circumstances will be considered when adjudicating public charge grounds.

USCIS announced Friday, March 13, 2020, that the Public Charge Rule does not restrict access to testing, screening, or treatment of communicable diseases, including COVID-19. In addition, the rule does not restrict access to vaccines for children or adults to prevent vaccine-preventable diseases.

USCIS stated, that their reasoning was “To address the possibility that some aliens impacted by COVID-19 may be hesitant to seek necessary medical treatment or preventive services, USCIS will neither consider testing, treatment, nor preventative care (including vaccines, if a vaccine becomes available) related to COVID-19 as part of a public charge inadmissibility determination, nor as related to the public benefit condition applicable to certain nonimmigrants seeking an extension of stay or change of status, even if such treatment is provided or paid for by one or more public benefits, as defined in the rule (e.g. federally funded Medicaid).”

The Public Charge Rule is still subject to litigation challenging its validity and necessity. USCIS currently requires a Form I-864 Affidavit of Support which serves as a contract between the federal government and a US citizen sponsor to provide financial reimbursement to the federal government shouldthe intending immigrant rely on public benefits.  The Public Charge Rule as written simply allows USCIS to deny applications, even when an immigrant has a sponsor to support them,if they believe the immigrant is likely to become a public charge.

Despite these concerns regarding the necessity of the Public Charge Rule, the statement from USCIS that COVID-19 related testing and treatment is a positive step in supporting immigrants’ access to health care and achieving nation-wide cooperation in mitigating the spread of the disease.   

Should you have any questions about the Inadmissibility on Public Charge rule, please contact Stephen Antwine, Esq. at Green & Spiegel, LLC at (215) 395-8959.

Related Team

Stephen Antwine

Stephen Antwine

215-395-8959

215-395-8959

email Stephen

Philadelphia (US Headquarters)

Full Biography

Stephen Antwine

Recent Blogs

Sep 17, 2020

Appeals Court Rules Trump Administration Can End Temporary Protected Status (TPS)

The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Monday that President Trump can put an end to Temporary Protected Status (TPS), which would deny more than 300,000 individuals the ability to remain in the United States legally. Learn more in this blog.

Aug 26, 2020

President Trump’s RNC Naturalization Ceremony Was Misleading

Last night, The Republican National Convention broadcast featured a prerecorded segment in which President Trump hosted a naturalization ceremony for five candidates at the White House. The president attempted to soften his image of being harsh on immigration by highlighting the achievements of these five diverse individuals and emphasizing the incredible honor of becoming a naturalized citizen of the United States. Learn more in this blog.

Aug 26, 2020

USCIS Avoided Furloughs and Will Stay Open through September 30th End of the Fiscal Year

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that the agency will remain open through the end of the 2020 fiscal year. The word at the end of July was that the agency would essentially shut down at the end of August due to unprecedented deficits. The agency delayed the furlough plan and kept its employees working, in hopes that either Congress would bail the agency out or revenues would increase enough as the pandemic economic restrictions eased. That gamble appears to have paid off and the agency has sufficient resources to self-fund through this fiscal year.