On May 28th, 2025 the Honourable David Piccini, Minister of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development of Ontario tabled Bill C-30, the Working for Workers Seven Act, 2025 with the goals of protecting Ontario workers and the provincial economy. If passed in its proposed form, the Act has the potential to significantly alter several key aspects of the Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program (OINP) creating implications for both applicants, and employers supporting workers under this program.
As permanent resident spots become more and more difficult to secure due to increased competition, the OINP has grown in popularity over the past few years, receiving a total of 21,500 allocated nominations in 2024. To keep up with its increased popularity, the OINP has released technological solutions to achieve quick processing times, introduced an expression of interest system to tailor program applicants to labour market gaps, and expanded their investigatory authority through the Ontario Immigration Act in order to identify fraudulent applications and improve protections for foreign workers.
While any policy changes designed to protect foreign workers are welcomed, especially in light of unscrupulous employers or immigration representatives who may require consideration for extending job offers, it is important to review the practical implications of these proposed changes on bona fide candidates hoping to apply under the various OINP streams. The key provisions of Bill C-30 which have the potential to impact OINP applicants and employers are as follows:
1. Enabling the Lieutenant Governor in Council to respond to labour market needs by giving the Minister the ability to establish or remove immigrant nomination streams.
2. Making the OINP more responsive by allowing the government to return applications that no longer match current job market needs or raise concerns – so we can focus on processing the strongest candidates more efficiently.
Introducing an ability for the OINP to return submitted and complete applications based on labour market priorities also reduces predictability in workforce planning and is unprecedented in an expression of interest system. In OINP’s current system, candidates are invited based in part, on their occupation. If the OINP is permitted to return complete applications, neither applicants nor their supporting employers will be sure that even a complete application will be processed until a decision is rendered, which can take over 6 months based on recent processing times. Rather than addressing labour market gaps, this may place employers relying on the OINP to meet their workforce needs behind the finish line and force them toward other immigration program streams. It may also have implications on applicants who are expecting to receive a work permit support letter when their nomination certificate is issued to facilitate a work permit extension. This calls into question whether principles of fairness are being met, where the longer the OINP takes to process an application, the higher the risk that an applicant’s file could be returned under this power.








