Back to Top skip to main content
Green and Spiegel - An Immigration Law Firm
Sep 6, 2019

A breakdown of the major Canadian political parties position on immigration

Ghazi Jarrar

The writ has not been dropped yet, but Canada’s political parties are already in campaign mode. Perhaps more so than usual, immigration is featuring as a hotly contested issue in this year’s federal election. To help you make sense of where the different political parties stand, the table below breaks down each party’s position by immigration topic.


Conservative Party of Canada

Green Party of Canada

Liberal Party of Canada

New Democratic Party

People’s Party of Canada

Economic Immigration

“Emphasize” economic immigration

No clear position

No clear position, but the Government plans to make the Global Talent Stream a permanent program

No clear position

Reform the point system to focus on accepting a larger portion of economic migrants

Recognition of Foreign Credentials

Improve foreign credential recognition

Remove barriers preventing recognition of foreign credentials

No clear position

Work with the provinces to address gaps in settlement services and improve foreign credential recognition

No clear position

Pathway to Permanent Residence (“PR”) for Temporary Foreign Workers (“TFWs”)

Provide “low skilled” workers with pathway to PR

No clear position

Government recently introduced a pilot program to create pathway to PR for caregivers

Provide caregivers with status and family reunification

No clear position

Family Reunification

Ensure that spouses and children are reunited

No clear position

No clear position

Prioritize family reunification and eliminate caps on applications to sponsor parents and grandparents

Abolish parent and grandparent sponsorship programs and limit the number of people arriving under the family category

Overall Number of Newcomers

Set immigration levels at “what is consistent with…Canada’s best interest” as opposed to the current “arbitrary immigration levels”

No clear position

No clear position but 2019 Budget Bill pledged $78.6 million to facilitate the processing of visas and permits

No clear position

Lower the total number of migrants from 350,000 to 100,000 and 150,000 depending on the state of the economy

Safe Third Country Agreement (“STCA”)

Close “loopholes” (otherwise known as exceptions) in the STCA allowing asylum seekers to cross the border at unofficial entry points

No explicit position, but Elizabeth May has stated that “the United States should no longer be designated as a ‘Safe Third Country’”

No indication of intention to repeal or amend the STCA. Liberal Ministers continue to express that the US is a safe country

Suspend the STCA with the United States

Declare the entire border an official point of entry and send back to the US anyone who enters without authorization

Irregular Border Crossings

End irregular crossings by closing STCA exceptions

Elizabeth May has spoken about the fact that many irregular crossers are fleeing persecution and need access to ordinary due process

The 2019 Budget Bill pledged $1.18 billion in additional resources to strengthen border processing and removals

Remove the need for irregular crossings by suspending the STCA and allowing asylum seekers to cross at regular entry points

Fence off areas at the border where irregular migration takes place


Crack-down on those who “game the system”

Repeal the legal provisions that encourage rapid deportations

No clear position, but the Government has increased and sped up deportations in the last year

No clear position

Send back to the US anyone who enters without authorization

Undocumented People

No clear position

Establish program to deal with the 200,000 undocumented people in Canada

No clear position, but the Government introduced a program to regularize the status of some undocumented construction workers in the Greater Toronto Area

No clear position

No clear position

Refugee Determination

Prioritize those who face “true persecution”

Include environmental refugees as a recognized category

The 2019 Budget Bill introduced provisions making asylum seekers ineligible for refugee status if they made a claim in a country with which Canada has an agreement

Reduce refugee backlogs at the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

Stop “our reliance on the United Nations for refugee selection”

Private Refugee Sponsorship

Increase numbers or lift the current cap

No clear position

No clear position

No clear position

Rely more on private sponsorship

UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration

Andrew Scheer appears to have walked away from earlier pledge to un-sign the Compact

Support it

Support it

Support it

Un-sign the Compact

Immigration Consultants

No clear position

Toughen the regulations governing the industry

The 2019 Budget Bill introduced a self-regulating body for immigration consultants

Ensure that the industry is regulated by the Government

No clear position

Lost Canadians

No clear position

Ensure that Lost Canadians receive citizenship

No clear ​position

No clear position

No clear position


For a more detailed analysis of the parties’ various positions on immigration issues, please see this article by Green and Spiegel’s very own Kelly Goldthorpe and Ghazi Jarrar in The Lawyer’s Daily [Subscription required].

Recent Blogs

Sep 18, 2019

Top Ten Express Entry Questions

Express Entry is becoming more popular by the day. Just this year, IRCC invited 63,400 candidates to apply for permanent residence through the syst...

Jul 30, 2019

Half-Year in Review: Top Canadian Immigration Updates

Rising Express Entry Scores Candidates waiting in the Express Entry system to receive an Invitation to Apply (ITA) for permanent residence could ha...

Jul 16, 2019

Supreme Court of Canada Rules that Immigration Detainees have the Right to Habeas Corpus

Introduction: As a result of a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision released on May 10th, 2019—Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Prepa...