Back to Top skip to main content
Green and Spiegel - An Immigration Law Firm - United States
Menu
Jun 22, 2018

Consumer Pressure Mounting: Is Your Company At Risk of Forced Labor in Your Supply Chain?

Consumer concerns about the use of forced labor are rapidly growing, putting legal pressure on large corporations such as Costco, to reduce the use of forced labor in their supply chain.  This could be ground breaking, and with many corporations now publishing human rights and anti-human trafficking policies in compliance with the California Supply Chain Transparency Act, it is crucial to take notice of this potential new cause of action, upon which relief could be granted. 

Recently, the Ninth Circuit recently dismissed a class action against Mars Inc., where plaintiffs alleged that Mars had a duty to disclose the possible use of forced labor in the supply chain of its cocoa.  The court held that since Mars had no public human rights or anti-human trafficking policy, it was not in violation of disclosure laws which would require the corporation to disclose the use of forced labor.

However, this case could have broader effects. In 2015, plaintiffs filed a class action suit against Costco for false advertising, alleging the retailer knowingly sold prawns farmed in connected with forced labor, in violation of the whole sale giant’s public anti-human rights abuses policy.  In 2017, the U.S. District Court dismissed the case, stating that the consumers failed to prove they relied on Costco’s anti-human rights abuses policy before purchasing the prawns, and that they only became aware of the possible use of forced labor after their purchase. However, following the Mars decision, plaintiffs from the Costco suit are now asking the Ninth Circuit to allow them to amend their initial claim.  They argue that the Mars decision could possibly allow for them incorporate the changing precedence and now contend that Costco had a duty to disclose the known use of forced labor in the farming of the prawns, which contradicted its public anti-human rights abuses policy. 

Regardless of how the Court will fall on the plaintiffs’ request to amend their claim in the Costco suit, this further demonstrates the escalating concern about the use of forced labor in global supply chains.  Another large name brand, Coca Cola, has fallen to the pressure of reducing forced labor from their supply chain, after several media scandals and reports highlighted the human rights abuses connected to the brand.  Coca Cola is now working with the U.S. Department of State to increase transparency and traceability of its supply chain through the innovative use of blockchain technology.

The question for corporations is no longer why it should have a sustainable and forced labor free supply chain, but how to achieve this goal.  The consumer market is becoming increasingly more socially aware, and taking human rights abuses seriously.  Companies now must better equip themselves with the tools necessary to uncover forced labor and eliminate it from the supply chain.  If you would like to find out if your company is at risk for the use of forced labor in your supply chain, and how to remedy it, please contact us immediately. 

Related Services:

Recent Blogs

Oct 11, 2019

USCIS Oversteps On Demand For Personal Income Information In New, Form I-944 Relating To “Public Charge”

Beginning October 15, 2019, all applicants for adjustment of status will be required to file a new, Form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS). USCIS has instituted this new form in order for individuals applying for permanent residence to demonstrate that they are not likely be become a “a public charge” pursuant to INA § 212(a)(4). Learn more in this blog.

Oct 04, 2019

What does New York’s Immigration Guidance Mean for Employers in Other States?

New York City has some of the most robust employee legal protections in the United States. The September 24, 2019 New York Commission on Human Rights Legal Enforcement Guidance on Discrimination on the Basis of Immigration Status and National Origin (“NYC Guidance”) fits comfortably within this broader evolution of New York human rights protections. This new guidance provides detailed pointers on which actions are likely to invite discrimination claims and it is wise to review company policies with competent counsel if doing work in New York City. Learn more.

Sep 23, 2019

California Changed the Definition of "Employee" and Employers Need to Respond Deliberately

Assembly Bill No. 5, Worker Status: Employees and Independent Contractors (“AB-5”) became California law on September 18, 2019. What does this means for the “gig economy”, or those in a wide range of employment which is temporary and contractual? Find out in this blog.