Back to Top skip to main content
GandS U.S. Immigration Logo
Jan 15, 2018

DACA News: Federal Court Reinstates Program; Bipartisan Legislative Deal Rejected Amidst Presidential Controversy

Earlier this fall, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the repeal of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program through “wind-down” provisions leading to full termination by March 5, 2018.  On January 9, 2018, U.S. District Judge William Alsup, in San Francisco, temporarily halted the wind-down by granting a preliminary injunction to reinstate DACA.  This has been seen as a victory for DACA recipients (also known as “Dreamers”), who were facing expiring work authorization and would otherwise be subject to deportation come March.

The Trump Administration, in an attempt to fulfill its campaign promise, set out to eliminate DACA on questionable legal grounds that it supposedly violated U.S. Constitutional and Administrative law.  It claimed that the program was an illegal exercise of power by the Executive Branch. However, legal experts around the country argue that DACA is well within the legal framework of the Constitution, because DACA is a program of deferred action, a form of prosecutorial discretion.  They conclude that the Executive Branch has full authority to extend prosecutorial discretion to DACA recipients, allowing them to maintain lawful status in the U.S.

In The Regents of the University of California and Janet Napolitano, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security and Kristjen Nielsen, the Court held that the elimination of DACA was based on a mistake of law and thus necessitated the injunction. The Court concluded that the decision to rescind DACA was not a discretionary agency decision, nor that any prohibition under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) applied, allowing for judicial review. Further, the Court confirmed standing for the plaintiffs in the case. On these grounds, the Court allowed for the case to move forward and granted provisional relief, allowing DACA to be reinstated to the same terms and conditions prior to the September 5, 2017 repeal.  Although the Government could appeal this decision, this order forces the Department of Homeland Security to continue renewing applications until a final judgment is reached and litigation has concluded. 

The Court’s decision was announced while lawmakers are engaged in a public negotiation with President Trump over immigration reform. Despite a bipartisan consensus, the White House rejected a bipartisan deal while making derogatory comments, setting off a media firestorm.  No deal has yet been reached, and positions have already shifted among negotiations. In the meantime, many wonder if DACA will be included in the upcoming spending bill on January 19, or whether opposition to the bill, because of the DACA issue, will trigger a governmental shutdown.

Green and Spiegel is closely monitoring the developments and negotiations regarding the DACA program.  If you have any questions, please contact us immediately. 

Related Services:

Recent Blogs

Jan 21, 2022

DHS Adds 22 Fields to STEM Designated Degree Programs List for F-1 Students Seeking a 24-Month Extension of Post-Completion Optional Practical Training (OPT)

A Federal Register notice published January 21, 2022 announced that DHS "is amending the DHS STEM Designated Degree Program List by adding 22 qualifying fields of study and a corresponding Department of Education Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) code for each." This list is used to determine which degrees obtained by F-1 students following the completion of a program of study qualifies as a science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) degree for the F-1 student to be eligible to apply for a 24-month STEM extension of their Optional Practical Training (OPT). Learn more in this blog.

Jan 18, 2022

The Department of State (DOS) Has Submitted a New Proposal to Raise Consular Service Fees

On December 29, 2021, the DOS issued a proposal raising the Consular Service fees for Nonimmigrant (NIV) and Special Visas. Comments on the proposed rule are due February 28, 2022. Learn more in this blog.

Dec 22, 2021

2022 to Bring New Changes to Mail-In Renewals in Australia

As our Australian clients are acutely aware, between limited, expensive, and frequently-cancelled-flights to the financial and psychological toll of a mandatory 2-week-quarantine on their own dime (which has been shortened as of late), to even requiring permission to leave the country again, returning Down Under over the past 21 months has been tough to say the least. However, once landed and released back into the world, Australian Citizens have usually benefitted from shorter wait-times for in-person Visa Appointments. Even as slots have vanished over the past few months with the U.S. Consulate in Sydney’s move, Australian Citizens have had the extra option of mailing-in Visa Applications for renewals once they are in the country, so long as they satisfy a list of requirements including but not limited to applying for the same classification of a visa that expired within the defined period of time.