Back to Top skip to main content
Green and Spiegel - An Immigration Law Firm - United States
Menu
Oct 24, 2017

USCIS Rescinds Guidance Granting Deference to Nonimmigrant Petition Approvals

Andrew Clancy Rodgers and Jonathan A. Grode

On October 23, 2017, USCIS issued a Policy Memorandum rescinding previous guidance that directed adjudicators to defer to prior determinations of eligibility when adjudicating petitions for extension of nonimmigrant status. 

By way of background, on April 23, 2004, USCIS issued a memorandum titled “The Significance of a Prior CIS Approval of a Nonimmigrant Petition in the Context of a Subsequent Determination Regarding Eligibility for Extension of Petition Validity.”  This previous memorandum directed adjudicators, when adjudicating petition extensions involving the same parties and underlying facts as the initial petition, to defer to prior determinations of eligibility, except in certain, limited circumstances.  These circumstances included where: (1) there was a material error with regard to the previous petition approval; (2) a substantial change in circumstances has taken place; or (3) there is new material information that adversely impacts the petitioner’s or beneficiary’s eligibility. 

The Memorandum issued yesterday rescinds the policy outlined above, and purports to provide updated guidance that is both more consistent with the agency’s current priorities (for example, the Administration’s “Buy American, Hire American” Executive Order) and also supposedly advances policies that protect the interests of U.S. workers.  Specifically, the Policy Memorandum emphasizes that USCIS adjudicator’s fact-finding authority should not be constrained by any prior petition approval, but instead should be based on the merits of each case.  The Policy Memorandum further directs that adjudicators “should not feel constrained in requesting additional documentation in the course of adjudication a petition extension, consistent with USCIS policy regarding requests for evidence, notices of intent to deny, and the adjudication of petitions for nonimmigrant benefits.” 

Unfortunately, the effect of this Policy Memorandum will likely be that petitions for extension of nonimmigrant status will start to experience a higher rate of Requests for Evidence.  Further,  the rescission of the policy to defer to previous approvals could result in elongated processing times for petitions for extensions of nonimmigrant status.

The Memorandum, titled “Rescission of Guidance Regarding Deference to Prior Determinations of Eligibility in the Adjudication of Petitions for Extension of Nonimmigrant Status”, is binding on all USCIS employees and is effective immediately.   For further guidance and insight, we encourage you to speak with an attorney on how best to approach an extension of status petition.  As always, Green and Spiegel will continue to monitor how this guidance takes effect.

 

Recent Blogs

Aug 14, 2019

The New Public Charge Rule: What Receiving a Public Benefit Might Mean for Your Immigration Status

On August 12, 2019, USCIS announced a new rule which identifies any individual who is likely to become a public charge as inadmissible. Under the new regulation issued by the Trump Administration, a foreign national can be categorized as a public charge solely on the basis that he or she accepted a government-offered public benefit. Learn more in this blog.

Jul 24, 2019

What Is FDNS and Why Are They Doing So Many Office Site Visits?

The Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS) has been around for fifteen years but the first time most companies and attorneys hear of it is when officers show up to conduct an inspection on non-immigrant worker visas. Their site visits are unannounced and often send companies scrambling. Learn more in this blog.

Jul 16, 2019

Josh Rolf Leads Investment Visa Discussion in Buenos Aires

On July 12, 2019, Green and Spiegel Associate Joshua Rolf appeared at Marval, O’Farrell & Mairal in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Read the full event recap here.