Back to Top skip to main content
Green and Spiegel - An Immigration Law Firm - United States
Sep 30, 2020

Breaking – Federal Court Blocks Implementation of Fee Increases

Joshua H. Rolf

Quick Takeaways

  • Blocks rule that was set to go into effect on October 2, 2020.
  • Current fees, forms, and processing times will remain in effect for now.
  • DHS expected to appeal injunction.

After hearing oral arguments this past Friday, a Federal Court in Northern California has enjoined the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) from implementing USCIS’ proposed fee increases that were scheduled to take effect on October 2, 2020. Per our prior update on this topic, these altered fees were to be accompanied by new forms, amended processing times, additional filing requirements, and the elimination of most fee waivers. Of note, the cost of filing for citizenship was set to nearly double, asylum applications would be accompanied by a filing fee, Premium Processing would move from 15 calendar days to 15 business days, advance parole and employment authorization fees would increase and be decoupled from adjustment of status filings, and all nonimmigrant classifications traditionally including in the Form I-129 would have their own individual forms that have not been released and yet would have been required for all filings as of the end of this week.

Now, following the North District of California’s ruling in Immigrant Legal Resource Center, et al., v. Chad F. Wolf, et al.,DHS and USCIS will be required to continue with its present fees, waivers, forms, and processing times, while the Court weighs the legality of the proposed Rule itself. In issuing this ruling, the Court found that the Plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits for several reasons – first amongst them that Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Chad Wolf lacked authorization to issue the rule by virtue of his improper appointment. Additionally, the Court opined that the Plaintiffs raised legitimate claims regarding substantive and procedural defects to the Rule. The Court refused to issue a stay of the injunction while DHS appeals the ruling, but could do so at a later date.

With a forthcoming appeal and the opportunity for DHS to file a motion to stay the injunction amid ongoing litigation, the situation remains fluid. If you have any questions regarding how the injunction impacts your case, please do not hesitate to reach out to our Firm.

Related Team

Joshua H. Rolf

Joshua H. Rolf

(215) 395-8959

(215) 395-8959

email Joshua

Philadelphia (US Headquarters)

Full Biography

Joshua H. Rolf

Recent Blogs

Oct 19, 2020

USCIS Announces Increased Premium Processing Fees Effective October 19, 2020

Starting October 19, 2020, the fee for Premium Processing, will be $2,500 (previously $1,440) for all filings except those requesting H-2B (non-agricultural seasonal worker) or R-1 (Religious Worker) status, for which the new fee is $1,500 (previously $1,440).Any filings post-marked on or after October 19th must include the new fee amount. Any Form-1-907 postmarked on or after October 19th with the incorrect fee amount will be rejected and the fee returned.

Oct 13, 2020

US and European Partners are Moving Towards Reopening Transatlantic Travel by Adopting New Pandemic Protocols

KEY POINTS: • Foreign nationals who wish to travel to the United States from Europe either must fit into one of the travel restriction exceptions or obtain advance permission to board a plane to the U.S. • In the alternative, they may travel to a third country and quarantine there for two weeks prior to coming to the United States. • The U.S. and overseas partners are anxious to relax those restrictions. Advanced COVID-19 airport testing may provide a solution. • We expect some testing of these technologies followed by the announcement of new travel protocols in time for the winter holidays.

Oct 09, 2020

Biden Vs. Trump Comparison

As we approach the November elections it has never been clearer that this country faces upheaval and challenges that will bring about dramatic, lasting, and hopefully vital changes to our nation and its people. Here, we compare how the two candidates have and will handle immigration policy in the United States.