Back to Top skip to main content
Green and Spiegel - An Immigration Law Firm - United States
Jul 29, 2020

U.S. Department of Justice Slaps Down Company's Attempt to Hire Only Foreign Workers

David Spaulding


On July 27, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a settlement with ASTA CRS Inc. of Virginia (“ASTA”) which resolves complaints that ASTA discriminated against U.S. workers in hiring.  Of issue was ASTA’s job announcements and procedures which sought exclusively foreign workers and made clear the company’s preference for hiring non-U.S. persons.  These were violations of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the settlement saddles ASTA with policy changes, training, and DOJ oversight.


INA, 8 U.S.C. Section 1324b – Unfair immigration-related employment practices:


(1) GENERAL RULE It is unfair immigration-related employment practice for a person or other entity to discriminate against any individual (other than an unauthorized alien, as defined in section 1324(h)(3) of this title) with respect to the hiring, or recruitment or referral for a fee, of the individual for employment or discharging of the individual from employment –

(A) because of such individual’s national origin, or

(B) in the case of a protected individual (as defined in paragraph (3)), because of such individual’s citizenship status.

The section goes on to limit application of this rule to employers of three or more people and to make clear that persons authorized to work must be treated fairly in recruitment, hiring, employment, and discharge.

(See .)

Section 1324 complaints are filed with the U.S. DOJ, Civil Rights Division, Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER), a division tasked with investigating immigration discrimination in employment.

ASTA’s Violations:

The SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT between DOJ and ASTA (“Settlement Agreement”) states that, in August 2019, ASTA posted a job advertisement online which specifically sought “non-U.S. citizen applicants, including students who hold F-1 nonimmigrant visas, for entry-level positions.”  This prompted two U.S. citizen complaints of discrimination to the IER.  The IER investigation validated the complaints and instituted proceedings against ASTA.

By recruiting only foreign workers, present in the U.S. on temporary visas, ASTA was in direct violation of Section 1324.  Simply stated, an “authorized worker” is authorized to work U.S. jobs and employers don’t get to discriminate against classes of workers because of where they came from, unless they are engaged in very specific, mostly government contract, work which requires U.S. citizen employees only.

In ASTA’s case, whole classes of authorized workers were barred from applying for these jobs.  They discriminated against Lawfully Admitted Permanent Residents, U.S. Nationals, and U.S. Citizens as well as other non-immigrants authorized to work in the U.S.  By doing so in recruitment, the discrimination was well and fully documented prior to the IER investigation.

The Settlement:

ASTA has reached a settlement with DOJ on these matters:

“Under the terms of the settlement agreement, ASTA will train its employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, change its policies and procedures to comply with this law, and be subject to two years of department monitoring requirements, including providing regular reports to the department.”

Bottom Line:

INA, 8 U.S. Code, Section 1324a bars the employment of unauthorized workers and employers are required to document worker identity and authorization on the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification. Employers are barred from discriminating against authorized workers in recruitment, hiring, employment, and termination; this includes authorized foreign workers, U.S. permanent residents, U.S. nationals, and U.S. citizens.

Fortunately, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) maintains extensive and user-friendly guidance through its “I-9 Central” and many routine questions are easily answered there.  Additionally, USCIS provides an online and printable Form M-274, Handbook for Employers, to the public, a document I universally recommend that clients print and use in employment actions.

The Green and Spiegel compliance and enforcement practice is perfectly positioned to help companies manage these matters.  We provide defense work in IER matters and assist in crafting sound policies, providing training, self-auditing and analysis, and responding to worksite enforcement matters generally.  We have the experience and capacity to serve client compliance interests.

If your company wants help with such matters, please contact our compliance and regulatory enforcement team at Green and Spiegel, LLC.  You can also call or text me directly at 484-645-4194 or email me at

Related Team

D Spaulding Team Page

David Spaulding

(215) 395-8959

(215) 395-8959

email David

Philadelphia (US Headquarters)

Full Biography

David Spaulding

Recent Blogs

Oct 19, 2020

USCIS Announces Increased Premium Processing Fees Effective October 19, 2020

Starting October 19, 2020, the fee for Premium Processing, will be $2,500 (previously $1,440) for all filings except those requesting H-2B (non-agricultural seasonal worker) or R-1 (Religious Worker) status, for which the new fee is $1,500 (previously $1,440).Any filings post-marked on or after October 19th must include the new fee amount. Any Form-1-907 postmarked on or after October 19th with the incorrect fee amount will be rejected and the fee returned.

Oct 13, 2020

US and European Partners are Moving Towards Reopening Transatlantic Travel by Adopting New Pandemic Protocols

KEY POINTS: • Foreign nationals who wish to travel to the United States from Europe either must fit into one of the travel restriction exceptions or obtain advance permission to board a plane to the U.S. • In the alternative, they may travel to a third country and quarantine there for two weeks prior to coming to the United States. • The U.S. and overseas partners are anxious to relax those restrictions. Advanced COVID-19 airport testing may provide a solution. • We expect some testing of these technologies followed by the announcement of new travel protocols in time for the winter holidays.

Oct 09, 2020

Biden Vs. Trump Comparison

As we approach the November elections it has never been clearer that this country faces upheaval and challenges that will bring about dramatic, lasting, and hopefully vital changes to our nation and its people. Here, we compare how the two candidates have and will handle immigration policy in the United States.