Back to Top skip to main content
GandS U.S. Immigration Logo
Apr 6, 2020

Proposed Lehigh County, PA Regulation Changes May Restrict GOVT Contract Bidding

David Spaulding

Lehigh County, PA commissioners have introduced a regulation change which, if enacted, would limit which construction companies can bid for government contracts.

On March 4, 2020, Lehigh County Commissioners proposed an ordinance which would adversely affect the construction industry and which may be a blueprint for other ordinances.  The title is “AN ORDINANCE OF LEHIGH COUNTY PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE SOLICITATION AND AWARD OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS WITHIN LEHIGH COUNTY AND AMENDING SECTION 801.3 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE” and it is Bill No. 2020 - 07 (“Regulation”). 

The Regulations states that a contractor, for any government work over $100,000, has to submit a “CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY CERTIFICATE,” a Subcontractor List, and a Subcontractor Responsibility Certificate for each subcontractor on the project. 

Only “Class A Apprenticeship” Compliant Companies Could Bid Under these Regulations.

On its face, the requirement that companies certify that they will use subcontractors to competently perform  the work sounds reasonable.  However, Page 3, Section (D)(1), requires of contractors “proof that the subcontractor participates in a Class A Apprenticeship Program.” 

The designation “Class A Apprenticeship Program” is something of a fiction since apprenticeship programs are not defined this way by Pennsylvania or the federal government.  Therefore, we have to look at the Regulation itself to know what that means.  It is defined on Page 5, Section (D)(3)(l) as one which: 1) is registered, 2) has graduated apprentices to journey person status for 3 of the last 5 years.  

Whatever the Underlying Intent, the Regulation Will Likely Have a Negative Practical Effect on the Construction Industry.

 Since the Lehigh County Commissioners did not reference any particular incident or issue in proposing the Regulation so we can only really look at its practical effects to evaluate it:  Let us say Contractor X bids on work worth $100,000 +; under this Regulation, only subcontractors which have a qualifying apprenticeship program can work on the project.

A $100 K project is fairly small and an independent, non-union contractor would normally parcel out the sub-contractor jobs to smaller companies.   Under the proposed Regulation though, no small to mid-sized construction company could qualify as a contractor, much less a sub-contractor.  In essence, the Regulation quietly vests contracting in a handful of companies which are large enough and have robust enough apprenticeship programs to meet the more restrictive requirements.  Alternatively, such companies could be fully aligned with unions which have large enough apprenticeship programs to consistently qualify under the “Class A” description in the Regulation.

The Regulation Does Not Seem to Serve Taxpayer Interests Either.

The Lehigh County Commissioners did not reference any incident in which this system has resulted in sub-standard work for Lehigh County in proposing these changes and there is no reasonable belief that small to mid-sized construction industry companies have failed to perform their government contracts well.  A rule which advantages only a small number of large companies in bidding for contracts must, by its nature, reduce competition.  Setting aside the impact on companies, this seems unwise for taxpayers. 

Competition is efficient and effective.  Reducing the number of companies which can compete for government contracts directly attacks the goals of government contracting policies; mainly, to efficiently use tax dollars to get the highest quality work.  Acknowledging that counties have a duty to make sure that projects are handled in a workmanlike manner, we want tax dollars spent well too.  That goal is thwarted by handing out contracts to a small group of pre-selected contractors and subcontractors.  We want high quality work at a fair price, not an inflation of costs by diminishing participants. 

Government Has Less Restrictive Means for Ensuring Workmanlike Performance of Construction Contracts.

Governments have immense resources and significant recourse to employ against a contractor who poorly performs the work.  Simple, normal inspection protocols are ostensibly sufficient to guarantee the county’s interest.  Pennsylvania Counties directly employ officials to oversee this work and to make sure that we, the taxpayers, get what we paid for so what is the problem this Regulation is designed to solve?

Bottom line?  This seems like an ill-advised solution to an undefined problem.  The Regulation cuts all but a small group of pre-selected construction businesses out of consideration and that neither seems like good policy, nor fair to businesses which pay substantial taxes and have as much right to bid for work as their competitors.

The Proposal Is Subject to Hearing Before it Becomes Law And Some Consideration Seems Appropriate.

For interested parties, it should be noted that there will be a Public Zoom with the Lehigh Board of Commissioners on Tuesday, April 7, 2020.  The text of the proposed Regulation can be found here:

Related Team

D Spaulding Team Page

David Spaulding

(215) 395-8959

(215) 395-8959

email David

Philadelphia (US Headquarters)

Full Biography

David Spaulding

Recent Blogs

Jan 27, 2021

Update – All In-Bound Travelers to United States Must Have Negative COVID-19 Test

As of January 26, 2021, all passengers on international flights to the United States must show a negative viral test for COVID-19. Requirement applies to all passengers, even U.S. Citizens, and as of right now proof of vaccination is not a substitute. Viral test must be taken within 72 hours of travel. Post-arrival self-quarantine also suggested. No testing requirements required at this time for travelers entering the United States at land crossings or by sea.

Jan 26, 2021

Proclamation on the Suspension of Entry as Immigrants and Non-Immigrants of Certain Additional Persons Who Pose a Risk of Transmitting Coronavirus Disease

On January 25, 2020, the Biden Administration extended the travel restrictions for Ireland, the United Kingdom, the Schengen Area, and Brazil and added travel restrictions for South Africa. Travel restrictions for South Africa go into effect on January 30, 2021 and the others are an extension of existing travel restrictions. The travel restrictions do not apply to a number of categories of Noncitizens and provide a waiver for the national interest. The policy does not contain procedures necessary to request national interest exceptions, likely leaving in place the procedures presently employed.

Jan 22, 2021

Biden Administration Changes to International Travel Policy Leaves People Wondering If the Travel Restrictions Will Remain

U.S. travel restrictions will be lifted unless the Biden Administration steps in. The White House says it will not lift the travel restrictions. COVID-19 testing and quarantine / isolation are not required for international travel. Learn more in this blog.