Back to Top skip to main content
GandS U.S. Immigration Logo
Nov 16, 2017

New Legislation Targets H-1B Dependent Employers

Joshua H. Rolf

On November 15, 2017, the House Judiciary Committee approved H.R. 170, better known as the Protect and Grow American Jobs Act, clearing the way for the new bill to move forward in the U.S. House of Representatives. H.R. 170’s sponsor, Representative Darrell Issa of California’s 49th Congressional District, issued a Press Release touting his proposed bipartisan legislation as a “common-sense” update to this widely utilized classification that will protect both the H-1B program and U.S. workers. Indeed, Representative Issa reaffirmed that while “[h]ighly skilled individuals that come to America through the H-1B visa program add tremendous value to the U.S. economy…loopholes in the program have allowed a small handful of employers to game the system to displace American workers and crowd out others who legitimately need the limited slots available to recruit individuals with unique skillsets not available here at home.”

Though subject to amendments that may take place during the legislative process, Representative Issa’s bill does appear to be gaining steam. As such, we will provide a general overview of key changes it would bring to the H-1B program.

In particular, the new bill will target employers that are H-1B dependent, a designation referring to entities whose H-1B employees make up a certain threshold proportion of their overall, full-time workforce in the United States. Per the U.S. Department of Labor, those proportions are as follows: 

 

NUMBER OF FULL‐TIME

EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES

(U.S. WORKERS AND H‐1B WORKERS)

 

 

NUMBER OF H‐1B

NONIMMIGRANT EMPLOYEES

 

1 to 25

8 or more

26 to 50

13 or more

51 or more

15% or more of workforce[1]

 

Employer need not make additional attestations and efforts if the employee in question will earn in excess of $60,000 per year, or if the worker has attained an advanced degree. Under H.R. 170, the same H-1B employee would need to receive the lesser of $135,000.00 or the mean wage (usually at or around a Level 3 Wage) for the occupational classification in the specific metropolitan statistical area in order to be exempt. Even more, if an H-1B dependent employer places workers at a third-party site, that worker’s salary will need to meet or exceed the mean wage for the occupational classification in the specific metropolitan statistical area.

In addition to increased wages, H.R. 170 would introduce additional attestations from both H-1B dependent employers and third parties receiving H-1B workers from dependent employers on temporary assignments, and will hold the latter accountable if there is a lapse in compliance. H-1B dependent employers will also be required to submit proof of recruitment in lieu of the “good faith steps” under the current regime.  

Consistent with this Administration’s emphasis on enforcement, H.R. 170 would authorize more frequent site visits to ensure compliance. To fund these visits, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security would levy an additional $495.00 fee for all H-1B dependent employers filing new H-1B Petitions.

As mentioned above, the House and Senate still have work to do on this bill, which Representative Issa summarizes on his website. Therefore, we at Green and Spiegel will continue to monitor this and all legislation that could affect our clients. Whether an H-1B employer or employee who thinks this proposed legislation may affect you, we are here as a trusted resource if you have any questions or concerns.


[1] If passed as drafted, this percentage would increase to 20%. 

Related Team

Joshua H. Rolf

Joshua H. Rolf

(215) 395-8959

(215) 395-8959

email Joshua

Philadelphia (US Headquarters)

Full Biography

Joshua H. Rolf

Recent Blogs

Feb 25, 2021

Biden Administration Lifts Suspension of Immigrant Visa Issuance

On February 24, 2021, the Biden Administration issued a Presidential Proclamation that reversed President Trump’s EO that, for more than 10 months, has prevented many foreign nationals physically outside the United States from obtaining an Immigrant Visa which, upon issuance and admission to the United States, would automatically convert the individual to a U.S. Lawful Permanent Resident (“LPR”). Passed under the guise of protecting the U.S. workforce since LPRs are permitted to accept any and all forms of employment, in effect, the ban served to keep close family members of U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents, diversity visa lottery winners, key employees, and others from obtaining the Immigrant Visa that would permit them to assume LPR status. Learn more in this blog.

Feb 24, 2021

BREAKING NEWS: USCIS Extends Premium Processing for E-3 Australian Specialty Worker Petitions

On February 24, 2021, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) announced that it would immediately provide the option of Premium Processing for petitioners filing Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, requesting a change or extension of status to E-3 classification, which applies only to Australian nationals coming to the U.S. to perform services in a specialty occupation. The USCIS premium processing service allows petitioners to pay an additional filing fee of $2500 to ensure a government response within fifteen days. Until now, this service was not available for the E-3 category. Learn more in this blog.

Feb 23, 2021

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to “Public Charge Rule”

On February 22, 2021, the Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments and determine the legality of the Trump Administration’s immigration rule that bars individuals from receiving residency if they previously received public benefits. The rule is commonly referred to as the “public charge rule.” Legal challenges to the rule have wound their way through the federal court system and now the final decision about the validity of the public charge rule rests with the Supreme Court. Learn more in this blog.