Back to Top skip to main content
Green and Spiegel - An Immigration Law Firm - United States
Apr 25, 2018

Federal Court Opens the Door for Full Reinstatement of DACA

Joshua H. Rolf and Jonathan A. Grode

On Tuesday, the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the Trump Administration’s decision to terminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program. Federal Courts in New York and California had previously held that the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) must continue to accept Applications for prior DACA recipients, known as Dreamers; the Federal Court in Washington, D.C. went beyond these previously issued injunctions by ordering DHS to accept new DACA Applications. Importantly, the Court has allowed DHS 90 days to proffer a reasonable justification for its decision to rescind DACA protections, meaning the agency will not be forced to accept new DACA Applications for approximately 3 months. If you are a DACA recipient or wish to investigate your eligibility for this program in the near future, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

The 90-day stay from Judge John D. Bates’ decision stems from the Court’s finding that the Trump Administration provided no legal justification for its September 2017 decision to rescind DACA protections for individuals brought to the United States as children and who meet several additional criteria. Though the Trump Administration labeled these protections offered via Executive Order to be illegal, the Court held that the rescission of DACA could not stand as implemented. Specifically, the Court found that DHS’ decision was “arbitrary and capricious because the department failed adequately to explain its conclusion that the program was unlawful,” and that if DHS could not provide an adequate justification for its decision within 90 days, the program would resume in full. 

The opinion of Judge Bates, a George W. Bush appointee, is the latest blow against the Trump Administration’s efforts to re-shape the U.S. immigration system by executive order. This time, the judiciary confirms the Administration must provide a legal and factual basis, not just an unfounded conclusion, for its decision to end DACA, and in doing so hold hostage the future of more than 700,000 DACA recipients in order to obtain increased border security and limits to legal immigration. Indeed, the President and his Administration rejected several bipartisan plans that would have protected Dreamers and offered them a path to citizenship in exchange for providing funding for the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, due to its belief that the bill did not do enough on security or to curb legal immigration to the United States. Now, with no deal in sight, several courts have ruled that this cruel bargaining chip violates the law, as enacted; and unless the Department of Justice provides a suitable legal justification for its decision to end DACA within 90 days (which it has said it will), DHS will be required to accept new DACA Applications along with the renewals it is presently mandated to process.

As with the Travel Bans, challenges to which are set for Oral Argument today at the U.S. Supreme Court, the Trump Administration’s executive action on DACA fulfills a campaign promise – cracking down on undocumented immigrants - while simultaneously demonstrating a lack of internal legal scrutiny in its drafting and implementation of immigration-related policy. Moreover, it is part and parcel with the President and his Administration’s negative portrayal of immigrant communities (not to mention degradation of the nations from which they come), and efforts to make life more difficult for foreign nationals present in the United States or seeking admission, a topic we have covered at length. We at Green and Spiegel remain dedicated to working on behalf of our clients in all of their endeavors, and applaud our colleagues whose hard work has protected so many.

Related Team

Joshua H. Rolf

Joshua H. Rolf

(215) 395-8959

(215) 395-8959

email Joshua

Philadelphia (US Headquarters)

Full Biography

Joshua H. Rolf
Jonathan Grode

Jonathan A. Grode

215-395-8959

215-395-8959

email Jonathan

Philadelphia (US Headquarters)
Providence (New England)

Full Biography

Jonathan A. Grode

Related Services:

Recent Blogs

Jun 26, 2020

Executive Order Update – Department of State Advises it Will NOT Issue Immigrant and Nonimmigrant Visas through December 31, 2020

Quick Takeaways: • Changes now in effect. • Unless subject to an exception, U.S. Department of State will not issue new or renewed nonimmigrant visas in the effected classes until December 31, 2020. • Likewise, suspension of immigrant visa issuance also extended through December 31, 2020. • No timeline on resumption of routine, in-person visa services.

Jun 25, 2020

UPDATE: Canadians, Bermudians, and All Current Visa Holders Exempt from Latest Executive Order

Quick Takeaways: • Changes now in effect. • Canadians and Bermudians excluded from Executive Order by virtue of being visa exempt. • All foreign nationals with presently valid H-1B, H-2B, J-1, and L-1 Visa holders also excluded, even if they have not entered the United States as of June 24. • Other questions still remain.

Jun 23, 2020

UPDATE: White House Suspends Issuance of H-1B, L-1, J-1, and H-2B Visas for Remainder of 2020

Quick Takeaways: -Changes go into effect 12:01AM EST on June 24, 2020 and unless lifted or enjoined will remain in place through at least December 31, 2020. -Suspends admission of H-1B, H-2B, L-1, and certain J-1 nonimmigrants and their dependents who are outside the United States and who do not have valid visas or other valid travel document as of the effective date. -Also extends existing suspension of immigrant visa issuance through December 31, 2020, subject to previously announced exceptions. -Individuals seeking a change to one of the affected statuses within the United States or who have a valid visa are not covered by the Executive Order are able to continuing processing. -Does not include Lawful Permanent Residents,spouses/children of U.S. Citizens, essential workers in food supply chain, and other individuals whose admission would be in the “national interest.” -Other nonimmigrant workers (E-3, TN, H-1B1, O, P, etc.) are not included. -Many questions remain with respect to interpretation and implementation.